Originally taken from: www.history.com/topics/halloween
Here are some nice, cute or silly costumes I like:
And that's my beloved sister in her costume, hahaha I don't believe she will make someone scared :D
It's about results that are not produced by organizations but by people, by a special kind of people - the 'huddlers', who are able to work intimately and informally in small groups. It is one of the most effective means of communication.
To be effective, a manager needs to be a 'huddler'. Normal communications within an organization are in the form of inter-office memoranda and or e-mail, with copies to all and sundry. If it deals with matters which are confidential, and is so marked, then it is read by everyone including the office helpers, even before the message reaches the target person. So much for confidentiality.
Further, the recipient, already flooded with a paper explosion, hardly has the time to read it, let alone act on it. The same message conveyed verbally face-to-face will not only remain confidential but will be extremely effective.
Clarification, if any, is sought and given immediately, and in addition instant feedback ensures that there is complete understanding of the message and the resulting action required. Plus, of course, there is the 'human touch' element, completely lacking in the memorandum.
Huddling, of course, is nothing new. It has always been there in the matter of inter-personal relations. The book attempts to formalize an informal means of communication. There is, too, sufficient demonstration in the book, as from our personal experience, about the effectiveness and result-achieving ability of the technique.
A few minutes of informal conversation with subordinates, peers and superiors, along the corridors of the office or in the wash rooms can be most effective. The practice of this technique therefore needs to be encouraged.
Original path to the article: http://www.accel-team.com/communications/busComms_04.html
According to traditional Western thought from the antiquity through the Middle Ages, beauty is a constitutive element of the cosmos associated with order, harmony, and mathematics. Classical Philosophy treated and conceived beauty alongside truth, goodness, love, being, and the divine. In this concept, beauty is a supreme value, basic to the whole cosmos.
Kalokagatia- It's the highest ethic and esthetic principle in ancient Greece. This Principe is based on two words which means kάλος(beauty)kάι (and )aγάθοσ(good)
Conclusion that we need to accept for ancient Greek philosophy and Hellens in deed is that they were at the same time ethical as they were esthetical .Biant(one of the seven wisdom reach ancient philosopher) for example said: "You have to watch yourself in the mirror, if you are beautiful do lake that if you are not try to recover physical anomalies with doing good things. or Sappho(one of the greatest poetess from ancient time till today) said:”Someone who is beautiful for my eyes maybe is good person but someone who is good person is at the same time beautiful”. Real balance between two principles.
And how about today? Do we still consider a beautiful face and a body for a beautiful personality? May be not, but we can't deny the attraction we feel to those people. Beauty has always been a power and I believe now days it still is!
Soon the Barista is mixing the ingredients and tells you that the latte will be available at the product bar at the end of the counter. The end of the counter just past the pastry case… Hmmm… do I want the scone or the croissant today? Within seconds the few steps you take to pick up your gingerbread drink results in another sale. That dollar fifty cup-o-joe has turned into a seven dollar sale with a whopping total of 1100 calories to go with it.
A smile crosses your face as the Barista hands you your drink and a small bag with your scone in it. You turn around and grab a napkin from the mixing bar and take a seat next to the window. The Starbucks path took you from the front door to your eventual seat by the window. This modern day yellow brick road took you past many temptations and enticed you into the purchase of a few. As you finish your treat at the window seat you notice the new chrome travelers mug on the shelf next to you. You picture that mug saving you from an embarrassing spill in your car and the sale is made… another twenty dollars as you walk out the door.
What started as a $1.50 cup of coffee turned into a $27 shopping spree. The secret was placing high profit items along the “routine” path. Almost everyone takes the same path when they enter. The routine or ritual of Starbucks is intuitive and well laid out. You can take this same idea and apply it to almost any business.
The routine of a web based business is based on the navigation system. Are the destinations well laid out? Are the links intuitive? The better the path the more successful the site will be. When you go to a grocery store, the aisles are well laid out with signs telling you the products that are available on each aisle. Why are milk and eggs always at the back of the store? It’s to take you on a journey down the high profit isles of candy, cookies, and crackers.
Have you ever tried to use a different type of computer or PDA than you are used too? Is that Apple computer really easier to use if you are familiar with a PC? The closer to your regular routine the new device is, the more comfortable you will be. And comfort equals additional sales.
Does your business have a well laid out path and a comfortable routine? Do your customers know where they are going or are they playing a guessing game? Do they know how to read your street signs or are they facing a crossroads with no directions? Can they understand the language you use to describe your products or services or is it like a foreign language to their ears?
Patrick Hanlon talks about the rituals and sacred words that different brands use to differentiate themselves in his new book called “Primal Branding“. Patrick takes us on a fascinating journey into the business routines of successful companies such as Coke, Nike, and UPS and illustrates why they are so popular.
The next time you go into a store or purchase a product online, pay attention to the routine that you go through. Note the steps along the path. Could the path be better laid out? Is it too long to keep your attention? Do you get halfway down the path only to get frustrated and turn back. Are their flying monkeys and scary lions along the road or friendly people and smiling faces?
These are great questions to ask yourself about your own business or service. If the path is easy, well laid out, and full of happy people your customers will be happy, return often, and tell their friends about your yellow brick road!
Original path to the article: http://successbeginstoday.org/wordpress/2006/08/spark-the-routine-path/
Does Sex really sale? Or may be the question is when does sex sell? It's just a tool and if it's used well it may bring success, otherwise......
Here are a few commercials that are trying to sell by imposing sex:
1. Lingerie - I like it! There was a quote : "If love is blind why is lingerie so popular?"2. A vacuum - Really? Where's the vacuum? Doesn't look like something that would attract an average housewife.
3. Toilet Paper - feeling of intimacy... may be
4. Car. I think it's too much, but it's funny.
5. Coffee - Passion, art :)
An article from:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/time-out/201007/does-sex-really-sell
It was interesting to be read, as I not completely agree. But it's always good to see more points.
You probably think it's obvious that sex sells. That's a basic, unchallenged marketing belief. When it comes to advertising and sales, we naturally turn to eye candy, pretty women and men who are the ideal faces of persuasion. They smile seductively when they urge us to buy, buy buy! And we buy.
But with sex and sales, as with so many other issues, it turns out that more is not necessarily better. In fact, what a visual hint of sex will accomplish, a visual barrage of sex can destroy. Not long ago, researchers at Iowa State University found that viewers of programs with sexually explicit or violent content were less likely to remember commercials immediately after watching and even 24 hours later.
Does sex sell? Not necessarily, it turns out. It is not as obvious as we supposed. Perhaps we need to rethink some of our beliefs.
The Iowa study involved several hundred subjects aged 18-54 with demographics selected to match those of the U.S. television audience. Those who saw ads during neutral programming (no sexual or violent content) remembered the advertised products better than those who saw the ads during sexual or violent programs.
We can speculate about why this might be true. Perhaps it's because people pay so much attention to the violence and sex that they have less attention to spare for the commercials. Perhaps the sexual and violent images stir up their own thoughts, which interfere with the ability to pay attention to the commercials. Or perhaps, as is the case in real-life experience of trauma, strong emotions aroused by powerful images impaired their memory directly.
Regardless of the mechanism, the practical result of sex and violence on TV is that viewers remember less of the products the advertisers are trying to sell. If you can't remember it, you're not going to buy it.
The false notion that sex and violence sell comes from the fact that their intensity captures the channel surfer's attention. Advertising revenue is naively based on the number of viewers, regardless of whether their ads make an impact on them. But if the viewers can't remember the commercials on these shows, what difference does it make that more people are watching!
When television, or other media, is criticized for poor taste and poor judgment, it tends to explain away responsibility by referring to the marketplace: sex sells, the industry says. And we're in the business of selling products by selling commercials. But this Iowa study, and previous ones that examined violence alone, shows that argument to be false. Advertisers who want to make an impression on television viewers would be better off reaching fewer people who can remember their product, than reaching more people who are so overwhelmed by the program that the commercial message is lost. Sexually graphic, intensely violent television programs are selling only one thing: the message of excessive violence and sex.
It is a coarsening and degrading message. It is a message of hostility and misogyny. And it doesn't even work!